Distinct roles of pH and organic ligands in the dissolution of goethite by cysteine
Graphical abstract
Introduction
Iron (Fe) is one of the essential elements for the growth of plants and microorganisms on earth (Konhauser et al., 2011; Marschner, 1995). Despite the fact that the relative abundance of Fe in the earth's crust and soils is considerably high, the nature of the strong hydrolysis of Fe(III) to form Fe(III) oxyhydroxides results to a poor accessibilities by organisms/plants (Sparks, 2003; Sposito, 1994; Stumm and Lee, 1961). To tackle the deficiency of available Fe in soils, there are several strategies involved with organisms to promote the dissolution of iron oxides, including protons-promoted dissolution and ligands-promoted dissolution (Schenkeveld et al., 2016; Zinder et al., 1986). Previous studies have shown that organic ligands such as desferrioxamine B, citrate and oxalate, have high affinities towards Fe(III) oxyhydroxides through complexation with structural Fe(III) and turning to soluble ligand-Fe(III) complexes (Cervini-Silva and Sposito, 2002; Kraemer, 2004; Li et al., 2016; Schenkeveld et al., 2016; Suzuki et al., 1992; Urrutia et al., 1999). Such process is generally considered as the predominant path for Fe uptake by plants and microorganisms in the environment.
Recently, microbially induced electron transfer and redox processes have attracted increasingly interest due to their great impacts on the element cycles and the pollutant transformation (Li et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2020; Rui et al., 2013; Stams et al., 2006). Evidence suggests that the interaction between electroactive microorganisms and iron oxides is of particular importance in the Fe biogeochemical cycles. A few studies showed that small organic molecules (e.g., flavin, antraquinone-2,6-disulfonate and cysteine) excreted by microorganisms could act as electron shuttles to transfer electrons to the surface of iron oxides through surface complexes (Doong and Schink, 2002; Ma et al., 2015; Shi et al., 2016; Van der Zee and Cervantes, 2009; Xuan and Liang, 2017; Zhao et al., 2019). Accordingly, this becomes a key mechanism accelerating the electron transfer between microbes and minerals. Of these electron shuttles, cysteine containing a thiol structure (Doong and Schink, 2002; Giles et al., 2003) and three de-protonatable functional groups (i.e., -SH, -NH2 and -COOH) with pKa values of 1.71, 8.33 and 10.78 (Amirbahman et al., 1997; Salemi et al., 2009), respectively, exhibiting a great potential in complexing with Fe(III) oxyhydroxides under varying conditions. Considering the low redox potential of cysteine, this compound is likely to determine the Fe bioavailability in soils. However, such redox process may also relate with environmental conditions (e.g., pH), subsequently affecting the electron transfer process and the Fe bioavailability (e.g., Fe(II) generation and release). Meanwhile, the concomitant organic ligands such as citrate and oxalate by microorganisms or plants are also ubiquitous in soils, which have strong capability of complexing with Fe and possibly competing for the sites on the surface of iron oxides with cysteine (Elaine et al., 2017; Liu and Huang, 2003). All these scenarios may complicate this electron transferring process; however, the understanding of these effects on the bioavailability of Fe is largely scarce.
In this work, the interaction of three electron shuttles, namely cysteine, tryptophan and tyrosine on the surface of goethite – a typical Fe(III) oxyhydroxide widely presented in agricultural soils – was initially evaluated and the reductive dissolution of goethite by cysteine was systematically investigated under different conditions of solution pH and the presence of organic ligands, in terms of the generation and release of Fe(II). Subsequently, the adsorption and transformation of cysteine in the presence of goethite was analyzed. In addition, different effects of pH and organic ligands (i.e., citrate and oxalate) on the Fe(II) generation and release kinetics during the course of reductive dissolution of goethite were examined; and finally the underlying mechanisms were explored by spectroscopic and electrochemical techniques.
Section snippets
Chemicals
Iron nitrate nonahydrate (Fe(NO3)3•9H2O, 99.9%), potassium hydroxide (KOH, 85%), disodium hydrogen phosphate dodecahydrate (Na2HPO4•12H2O, 99%), sodium dihydrogen phosphate dihydrate (NaH2PO4•2H2O, 99%), 1,10-phenanthroline (C12H8N2•H2O, 99%), glycine (C2H5NO2, 99%), nitrilotriacetic acid (N(CH2COOH)3, 99%), oxalic acid dihydrate (C2H2O4•2H2O, 99%), and citric acid monohydrate (C6H8O7•H2O, 99%) were obtained from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd., China. Morpholine ethanesulfonic acid (C6H13NO
Fe(II) generation and release kinetics
Prior to batch experiments, the structure and morphology of the prepared goethite were systematically characterized. As shown in Appendix A Fig. S1a, the XRD patterns of the as-prepared goethite exhibits typical three characteristic peaks at ~ 21.2°, ~ 33.2°, and ~ 36.6°, corresponding to the facets of (101), (301) and (100) of goethite (Hou et al., 2017). The SSA of the prepared goethite was found to be 98 m2/g (Appendix A Fig. S1b). The SEM image of the goethite showed a rod-like crystal
Conclusions
This study examined the effects of pH and organic ligands on the interaction of electron shuttle (i.e., cysteine) with goethite, which was highly related to the bioavailability of Fe in soils. Our results suggested that the rate constant kobs value notably increased linearly from 0.05 to 0.10 hr−1 with the increase of cysteine concentration from 0.1 to 1 mmol/L. More importantly, the different roles of pH and organic ligands (i.e., oxalate and citrate) in accelerating the Fe(II) release from
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 42077301; 21876161), and the National Key Research and Development Project of China (No. 2020YFC1808702), Guangdong Academy of Sciences’ Project (No. 2019GDASYL-0102006).
References (47)
- et al.
Reductive dissolution of Fe(III) (hydr)oxides by cysteine: kinetics and mechanism
J. Colloid Interf. Sci.
(1997) - et al.
Effect of aqueous Fe(II) on Sb(V) sorption on soil and goethite
Chemosphere
(2016) - et al.
Magnetite/lanthanum hydroxide for phosphate sequestration and recovery from lake and the attenuation effects of sediment particles
Water Res.
(2018) - et al.
Green rusts as a new solution to sequester and stabilize phosphate in sediments under anoxic conditions and their implication for eutrophication control
Chem. Eng. J.
(2020) - et al.
Multiple roles of cysteine in biocatalysis
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
(2003) - et al.
Kinetics of lead adsorption by iron oxides formed under the influence of citrate
Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta
(2003) - et al.
Simultaneous removal of Cd(II) and As(III) by graphene-like biochar-supported zero-valent iron from irrigation waters under aerobic conditions: synergistic effects and mechanisms
J. Hazard. Mater.
(2020) - et al.
Dissolution mechanisms of goethite in the presence of siderophores and organic acids
Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta
(2007) - et al.
Ellman's reagent: 5, 5′-dithiobis (2-nitrobenzoic acid)—a reexamination
Anal. Biochem.
(1979) - et al.
Reductive dissolution of goethite and hematite by reduced flavins
Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta.
(2013)
Existence of stable Fe(II) complex in oxic river water and its determination
Water Res.
Impact and application of electron shuttles on the redox (bio)transformation of contaminants: a review
Biotechnol. Adv.
The coordination chemistry of weathering: II. Dissolution of Fe (III) oxides
Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta
Selective electrochemical sensor based on the electropolymerized p-coumaric acid for the direct determination of L-cysteine
Electrochim. Acta
Steady-state dissolution kinetics of aluminum-goethite in the presence of desferrioxamine-B and oxalate ligands
Environ. Sci. Technol.
The Iron Oxides: Structure, Properties, Reactions, Occurrences and Uses
Cysteine-mediated reductive dissolution of poorly crystalline iron(III) oxides by Geobacter sulfurreducens
Environ. Sci. Technol.
Fe(II)-mediated activation of oxygen by goethite for the As(III) oxidation and the mechanisms
Chin. Sci. Bull.
Hydroxylamine promoted goethite surface fenton degradation of organic pollutants
Environ. Sci. Technol.
Iron(III) catalyzed photochemical reduction of chromium(VI) by oxalate and citrate in aqueous solutions
Environ. Sci. Technol.
Iron in microbial metabolisms
Elements
Iron oxide dissolution and solubility in the presence of siderophores
Aquat. Sci.
Dissolution of hematite nanoparticle aggregates: influence of primary particle size, dissolution mechanism, and solution pH
Langmuir
Cited by (10)
Converting peracetic acid activation by Fe<inf>3</inf>O<inf>4</inf> from nonradical to radical pathway via the incorporation of L-cysteine
2024, Journal of Hazardous MaterialsImpacts of engineered nanoparticles and antibiotics on denitrification: Element cycling functional genes and antibiotic resistance genes
2022, Ecotoxicology and Environmental SafetyCitation Excerpt :Al2O3 and SiO2 at 500 mg/L led to an increase in nitrite accumulation, and the maximum accumulation of nitrite was 24.3 % and 27.4 % higher than that of the control (CK), respectively (Fig. 1d). In contrast, goethite promoted the reduction of nitrite, which may be attributed to the fact that the small organic molecules excreted by bacteria as electron shuttles accelerated the electron transfer between bacteria and goethite (Doong and Schink, 2002; Li et al., 2015, 2022; Shi et al., 2016). In addition, the fractions of dissolved and insoluble species for engineered NPs were calculated using Visual Minteq (ver.
Electron shuttle-induced oxidative transformation of arsenite on the surface of goethite and underlying mechanisms
2022, Journal of Hazardous MaterialsCitation Excerpt :In addition, the detailed survey XPS spectra of As 3d after reaction under anaerobic conditions was also investigated (Fig. S7a), the proportion of As(V) on goethite surface is significantly lower than that of aerobic conditions, again indicating the oxidation of As(III) was inhibited in goethite/cysteine under anaerobic conditions. Our previous study has found that the goethite can adsorb cysteine, then form a binary complex of cystine and goethite through -COOH, thiol, and disulfide functional groups (Li et al., 2022; Hu et al., 2021). It is important that cysteine has -COOH group, which can complex with Fe(II).
Cysteine induced cascade electron transfer by forming a unique ternary complex with Fe(II) on goethite
2021, Chemical GeologyCitation Excerpt :Hence, Raman spectra of cysteine, cystine, and goethite before and after reaction were collected. As shown in Fig. 2a, compared with pure cysteine and cystine, a peak at 2533 cm−1 was disappeared and one new peak at 498 cm−1 was observed in the sample after reaction between goethite and cysteine and no observed in pure goethite (marked magenta dashed line), which can be attributed to the thiol and disulfide functional groups bending vibrational, respectively (Brandt et al., 2008; Lee et al., 2015; Li et al., 2022), indicating that a binary complex of cystine and goethite formed in Goe-Cys system. This suggests that cysteine reduction and cystine formation occur during the NB reduction on goethite (Bhattacharyya et al., 2013; Eitel and Taillefert, 2017).
- ⁎⁎
These authors contributed equally.